Did you know that even hiring the most expensive or renowned lawyer in the country, without proof, nothing or little he will be able to do to solve your problem!?

The basis of our right is proof, whether to take action or to confront a dispute.

When a citizen seeks a lawyer to file a lawsuit or to defend himself against a dispute in his defence, the first question that this agent will certainly ask will be: “WHAT EVIDENCE DO YOU HAVE ABOUT THE CASE?”

Well, to file any action, whether at the state or federal level in our country, regardless of the legal area under discussion, our right is expressed and clear in the sense that the party has the duty to establish its right, according to the dictates of item I, of article 373 of our Code of Civil Procedure: Art. 373. The burden of proof is: I – on the author, as to the fact constituting his right;

On the other hand, when you become a defendant in a proceeding, the party must, with evidence, prevent, modify, or terminate the claim of its former adversary, in line, now, with the impositions of item II of article 373 of our Code of Civil Procedure: Art. 373. The burden of proof is: II – on the defendant, as to the existence of an impeding, modifying or extinguishing fact of the author’s right.

In conclusion, in this way, assuming that the PRIVATE DETECTIVE is the qualified professional, in our country, responsible for the production of private evidence, once hired and in the interests of its client, we attest, thus, to the indispensability of the PRIVATE INVESTIGATION, whether in the constitution of the client’s right or in the insurmountable defense of its defense.

PRIVATE DETECTIVE X LAWYER X EVIDENCE !?

Post navigation